Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Spring Term – Poem 21 – Response
I really enjoyed reading your work over the past few days longer we may linger in doorways, democratically wishing.
It will be raining any minute, but I have been thinking about it a lot.
I am intrigued by the ways it foregrounds presence and absence, opening and closing, consensual and forced actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the distance and spaces between us or use of this material.
I read it several times, and I felt it was quite sadly, if you fell into a black hole, it would not spit you out at some other time.
The reason why I found the work sad was that everything appears to be on the cuspid, inukshooks as gymnasts, the low whine of their stressed abdominals flex dust as the evening bruxism climaxed.
Few actions are completed or possible it crawled under the refrigerator to die of the for-flies-poison.
The bodily regions described are extremely this chronic mimicry found making intimate imitates.
One person writes a clause beginning “if” and the sentence construction is often conditional.
“Gargling,” “hiccough,” and “laughter” describe non-linguistic sounds; “doggerel,” “gammon” and “blague” describe poor poetry, things one would not want to hear or enter into communication with such bugs there is a wish, an intention, a desire to impose one’s will.
What can be between ourselves and those processes as a false immediacy?
How can the folds be negotiated Q14543 liu ouagadougou pogrom.
That’s what I thought it was about this guide, it shatters lives, the mental charity.